IF THERE ARE BANNER ADS ON THIS PAGE, PLEASE IGNORE THEM. I DIDN'T PUT THEM THERE.

Monday, October 27, 2008

Don’t count your chickens before you scramble the eggs

I think it was Yogi Berra who said, "It ain’t over till it’s over". The Republicans should take this advice to heart before their party eats itself in an orgy of mutual blame, finger-pointing and planning for careers after the election; McCain could still win this, and then where would they be?

A lot of information (admittedly, mostly second- or third-hand) has been coming to light regarding McCain staff quietly putting out feelers for future employment, acting for all the world like people who’ve already lost an election. Or rather, people who fully expect to loose an election. Moreover, Sarah Palin herself appears to be creating some distance from McCain, perhaps positioning herself for a future run for national office.

This all seems premature.

McCain seems to have placed his hopes on an electoral college strategy that would win him the election even while loosing the popular vote (sound familiar?). In fact, he appears to have given up on the popular vote already. Take Michigan, for example: he finds the probability of taking Michigan so slight he isn’t even campaigning there anymore. He’s not the first to adopt such a strategy, but what bothers me is that he might actually pull it off. Mathematically, it’s far from impossible.

This, of course, would set up a bigger firestorm than we had with the old who-won-Florida debacle eight years ago. Remember? Remember not knowing who won the election until weeks after the election? Remember the Supreme Court stepping in and deciding the election for us, despite the fact that they had no constitutional authority to do so or that the electoral procedures in place hadn’t even been fully utilized? I certainly remember. And I dread the same thing happening again. Could the U.S. face another such without domestic violence breaking out? I don’t know...but I doubt it.

(Get this straight: I am not advocating domestic violence in any form, and I don’t think it would benefit anyone. If it happens it would be the darkest day in U.S. history thus far.)

But let’s just look at it from another angle; what if Obama lost the popular vote but won the election through the electoral college? If you look at the polls thus far, it’s certainly possible...perhaps as likely as a McCain victory, I think. Would this be as great a disaster?

Hell yes it would.

The last two Presidential elections have been so close that it almost makes no difference. Hell, it didn’t make a difference in 2000. The voting public has shown itself to be sharply, and nearly evenly, divided, bitterly divided. One of the main reasons I have supported Obama for so long has been that I can see him as helping to heal this gaping wound on the body politic; I can’t see John McCain doing the same. I see a McCain presidency as continuing the divisiveness that has come to characterize American politics, and I see that as a very bad thing indeed.

Most of this changes if Obama wins through the electoral college but looses in the popular vote. In that case, any hope of healing this nation will have gone bye-bye and we will remain a bitterly divided, mutually disrespectful, mutually antagonistic society. I fear that. I fear what the consequences of such an election might be.

In light of this, I would find it difficult to accept any President who won under those conditions. So in that instance...and that instance only...I would favor John McCain over Barack Obama. But while it’s possible, I think it extremely unlikely. I think that Obama is likely to win both the popular vote and the electoral college. The next most possible event would McCain loosing the popular vote but winning through the electoral college; possible, but also extremely unlikely.

But then, I never thought Bush would defeat Gore in 2000. I still don’t think he did. So much for my ability to predict elections...

The Blues Viking

The opinions here expressed are mine and if you don’t like them you can get your own damn blog.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

I am comforted by this thought:
If the president is elected by The Electoral College but not by the popular vote, that is still Constitutional! The Electoral College fulfilled its intended role, that of preventing the population centers from ruling the rural. (This is not to say HOW the Electoral College vote is decided.)

I am NOT comforted by this thought:
If we do have any kind of repeat of voting irregularities as 2000, then it may be the state's governments that decide their state.

Here is a list of how states Red/Blue tendencies jibe with the Governor's party. IF there is going to be a problem, it will be where the difference is the greatest. I fear for Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida. And California, in a worst case scenario. That's all I'm going to say. I stated my piece a while back on this about martial law on Election Day. And that was before the Economic Crisis of Aught-Eight. What might have been race tension can now be class also. Joe the Plumber vs. the CEOs of Lehman, et al.

I would suggest having several cans of ravioli, a swiss army knife and a battery powered radio at the very least on Election Day.

Source: http://abcnews.go.com/

Battleground, Blue Governor
  Ohio
  Virginia
  N Carolina
  Pennsylvania

Battleground, Red Governor
  Indiana
  Missouri
  Colorado
  Nevada

Red state, Blue Governor
  W. Virginia
  Tennessee
  Kentucky
  Arizona
  Arkansas
  Kansas
  Oklahoma
  Nebraska
  Wyoming
  Montana

Blue state, Red Governor
  Minnesota
  Vermont
  California...

L.5immons said...

STRGLDR said:
"I would suggest having several cans of ravioli, a swiss army knife and a battery powered radio at the very least on Election Day."

Sure, so we could hurl Ravioli cans at any looters/assailants, slit our wrists and slowly bleed to death while listening to NPR.
(Sorry, that was the image that came to my mind.)
~and 'pick up my guitar and play,
Just like yesterday,
Then I'll get on my knees and pray...'

more like "Run like Hell!"

xox!

The Blues Viking said...

Starglider:

You're right about the constitutionallity of such a result, but my point is that in 2000 that was not what happened. The selection (note that I said selection and not election) of GWB was outside of the proper constitutional process.

And I do take your point about states' governments possibly deciding the election, and I agree it's a cause for concern.

And thanks for the state-by-state breakdown of "battleground" states. Very helpful.

But as regards survival supplies...the first draft of the article included this paragraph:

"Once upon a time, I used to be something of a survivalist. I outgrew it, but some of the old attitudes linger. When the Y2K scare was all the rage, I bought a couple of boxes of granoola bars and filled a couple of gallons of tapwater, and these and a flashlight made up my 'survival' kit for New Yeae's Eve."

I went on a bit further, saying that I wouldn't bother with all that this time, but I closed with the line "Now where did I put that flashlight?" In the end I cut it because I thought the article was long enough as it was. But since you brought it up...just where is that flashlight, after all?


Lovechild:

Did you know that steel guitar strings make excellent snare wires?

The Blues Viking

These thoughts are mine. Get your own.